The Week That Was November 15, 2003
1. New on the Web: OUR IRREPRESSIBLE GORDON PRATHER TAKES ON THE MERCURY PROBLEM. [For the uninitiated: SAT stands for Scholastic Aptitude Test and Lake Wobegon is said to be in Minnesota.] 2. CARBON DIOXIDE FROM WIND POWER PROJECTS 3. BUILD MORE OIL RIGS TO ENHANCE MARINE LIFE 4. UK'S BLAIR WOOS BANKS FOR EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME 5. NEW BOOKS 6. NEW LINKS TO RECOMMENDED WEB SITES 7. ENVIRO-EXTREMIST MOTTO ******************************************************** 2. Carbon Dioxide From Wind Power Projects "Estimates of carbon dioxide emissions from one of the world's growth industries have been grossly underestimated. Cement kilns contribute more to the world's output of carbon dioxide than aircraft and could soon be responsible for 10 per cent of the greenhouse gas. New calculations by an industry scientist reveal that cement manufacturers already produce 7 per cent of global CO2 emissions - almost three times previously published estimates - and that CO2 output is increasing faster from cement works than from any other industrial source. The silence on cement manufacture as a cause of global warming contrasts
with the growing concern over aircraft emissions, which are estimated
to contribute a maximum of 5 percent. Last month at the Earth Summit in
New York, the European Union called for a global tax on aircraft fuel.
But proposals for an internal EU tax on energy, aimed at reducing CO2
emissions, specifically excluded the cement industry because its energy
use is so high that it was thought a tax would damage it." Commercial wind 'farms' are not sustainable. Their infrastructure is composed of concrete, steel, aluminum, etc, all obtained from finite resources. They industrialize vast tracts of unspoiled landscape - another finite resource. Wind 'farms' produce their CO2 emission before they start to generate electricity! The manufacture, shipment, installation, and subsequent dismantling of these gigantic units create pollution. Commercial wind 'farms' use a huge amount of concrete in foundations for the turbines (some towers are made of concrete), service roads, and ancillary buildings. The ecological damage is irreversible [In Britain,] Carno wind 'farm' has 56 x 600-kilowatt wind turbines spread
over an area of 1500 acres. It cost about £30 ($50) million to build.
10,000 lorry loads of material were needed to build 12 kilometres of new
service roads for Carno (Bonus advertisement in "Windpower Monthly").
All this for an average, intermittent, unreliable 10-MW of electricity towards the UK demand for an average of 45,000 MW of a reliable supply of electricity! Windpower requires matching back-up at all times from reliable and controllable
fossil fuel or nuclear power; so no existing plant can close thanks to
windpower. Wind Turbines and Carbon Dioxide - a case study. A large turbine in Gloucestershire saves less than the amount of CO2 produced by just one articulated lorry. At Nympsfield in Gloucestershire a single 500-kW gearless Enercon turbine was commissioned in Dec. 1996. Its annual output is about 1.11 million kWh (Tilting at Windmills BBC 2, 2.2.99). Since the turbine generates not only during the day, when it might displace oil- or coal-fired generation, but also at night when mainly nuclear and gas generation are operating, it is logical to assume that it displaces a mix of fuels, rather than only coal or oil. Department of Trade and Industry figures indicate that the 1995 generating fuel mix produced an average of 620gm of CO2 per unit of electricity generated. Thus we can calculate that the Nympsfield turbine saved about 688 tonnes each year, or 0.078 tonnes per hour. An articulated lorry travelling at 50 mph along a motorway produces 0.08
tonnes of CO2 per hour. Given the uncontrolled growth of road traffic,
the erecting of turbines is a futile exercise. How many turbines would
we have to build each year to merely to keep pace with traffic growth? California governor-elect Arnold Schwarzenegger, citing environmental
concerns, pledged to oppose offshore oil and gas drilling. One of those
concerns is the effect of giant oil rigs on marine "eco-systems."
****************** 4. UK's Blair woos banks for emissions trading scheme ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Story by Alistair MacDonald and Jane Merriman 27/10/2003 SEPP Comment:
We see now why there is support for the Kyoto Protocol from potential
traders of emission rights (like ENRON). Of course, they will only have
value if there are caps on emissions, a la Kyoto or McLieberman. "Politicizing Science," discussed in TWTW of Aug 23, 2003:
Paul Grant's review was published in Nature on Oct 6, 2003 [Vol. 425,
pp.663-664] "The Discovery of Global Warming" by Spencer R. Weart (Harvard University Press, 2003. 228 pp. ~$25). An authoritative and well-written account, surprisingly fair to all sides of the debate and highly recommended. "Challenging environmental mythology: Wrestling Zeus" (Wm Andrew and SciTech Publishing Companies. 207 pp.) Brief popular essays by physicist Jack Dini, ranging from chemicals to air pollution and global warming, to radiation. Very readable, with technical references. "Eco-Imperialism: Green power, black death" (Free Enterprise Press and Merril Press. 2003. 179 pp. softbound. $15). Former Sierra Club member, geologist Paul Driessen explains how extreme environmental ideology kills poor people, esp. in Africa. "Bioevolution: How Biotechnology is changing our world," By Michael Fumento (Encounter Books, 2003. $29, 510 pp.) Covers medical applications, agriculture, and even pollution control. Authoritative and readable. *************************** 6. New links to recommended web sites www.numberwatch.co.uk by Prof John Brignell www.ecoNOT.com by Robert Bidinotto www.fumento.com by Michael Fumento http://envirotruth.org by National Center for Public Policy Research ************ 7. Enviro-extremist motto: "An ounce of fear and passion is worth a ton of fact and logic" ************************************************
|